Contact

Reaching the editorial and research team at Fantasy Analytics Authority connects analysts, data professionals, fantasy sports operators, and general readers with the staff responsible for the site's reference content. This page explains the available contact channels, the geographic scope of coverage, and how to structure an inquiry so it reaches the right team and receives a substantive response.

Additional contact options

Fantasy Analytics Authority maintains communication pathways suited to different inquiry types. Understanding which channel fits a specific need reduces resolution time and ensures the message is routed to the relevant editorial or technical reviewer.

Email (primary channel): The main editorial inbox handles content correction requests, sourcing disputes, and research partnership inquiries. Email is the preferred channel for any inquiry requiring documentation or follow-up over multiple exchanges.

Public records and data correction submissions: Inquiries referencing published data from named sources — such as the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (for occupational data cited in industry-scope articles), league statistical archives from MLB, NFL, NBA, or NHL official record keepers, or Sports Reference LLC databases — should be submitted in writing with the original source URL and the specific figure in dispute.

Press and syndication inquiries: Organizations seeking to reference, excerpt, or republish content from this site should direct requests to the editorial team through the primary email channel. All syndication discussions operate under the terms of the Creative Commons attribution standards where applicable, or by direct written agreement.

Technical feedback: Errors in data visualizations, broken tool embeds, or API-referenced content (for example, content drawing on feeds discussed in the Fantasy Sports APIs and Data Feeds reference) should be flagged with the specific page URL, the browser and device type, and a description of the observed error.

How to reach this office

Fantasy Analytics Authority operates as a digital-first reference property with no walk-in location. All contact is handled through written correspondence.

The following structured process applies to all inbound inquiries:

1. Identify the inquiry category — editorial correction, data dispute, research collaboration, licensing, technical error, or general question.
2. Locate the relevant reference page — linking to the specific page (for example, Projections vs. Rankings in Fantasy Sports or Injury Analytics and Fantasy Sports) helps editorial staff locate the content in question within 1 business day rather than the standard 3-to-5 business day window.
3. Submit via the appropriate channel — email for written record; the technical feedback form for rendering or data feed issues.
4. Await routing confirmation — all submissions receive a category-routing confirmation before substantive review begins.

Response time benchmarks by category:

Service area covered

Fantasy Analytics Authority covers fantasy sports analytics across all major U.S. professional leagues — NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL — as well as daily fantasy sports (DFS) formats operating within the regulatory frameworks recognized by the Fantasy Sports & Gaming Association (FSGA) and governed at the state level under statutes that classify daily fantasy contests as games of skill rather than gambling in 44 states as of the FSGA's most recent published state-law survey.

Content scope extends to the statistical methodologies, data science frameworks, and decision-support tools relevant to fantasy sports analysis. Regulatory framing referenced on this site draws from named bodies including the FSGA, the American Gaming Association (AGA), and state-level gaming control boards such as the New York State Gaming Commission and the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission.

This site does not cover international fantasy leagues, offshore DFS platforms, or real-money gaming products outside the U.S. regulatory perimeter. For context on the analytical frameworks that do fall within scope, the Regulatory Context for Fantasy Analytics reference page outlines the applicable statutory landscape in detail.

What to include in your message

A well-structured inquiry allows editorial reviewers to act without back-and-forth clarification delays. The following components should appear in every submission:

For editorial and data corrections:
- The full URL of the page containing the disputed content
- The specific sentence, figure, or table in question
- The named public source that contradicts or updates the published information (e.g., a direct link to an ESPN Stats & Info release, a Baseball Reference page, or a published academic study from a named journal)
- A proposed correction, if one is available

For research and data collaboration inquiries:
- The organization or affiliation of the submitting party
- The scope of the proposed collaboration (data sharing, co-publication, methodology review)
- Any relevant public work — published models, open-source repositories, or cited analyses in the vein of topics covered in Building a Fantasy Analytics Model or Advanced Statistics in Fantasy Sports

For general questions:
- A specific question rather than an open-ended request ("What projection methodology does this site recommend for running backs?" cannot be answered through a contact channel — the Predictive Modeling Fantasy Sports reference page addresses that category of question directly)
- Reference to any existing site content already consulted

Submissions lacking a named source, a specific page reference, or a clearly stated question type will be deprioritized in the routing queue behind complete submissions. This is a function of editorial capacity, not policy — the review team processes roughly 40 to 60 inbound messages per week across all categories.

References

• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics